Trade News:The Pittsburgh Steelers are being advised to remove on veteran Matthew Stafford from their list of…
Why the Pittsburgh Steelers Should Remove Matthew Stafford from Their Trade Wishlist
The Pittsburgh Steelers have been heavily linked to multiple veteran quarterbacks this offseason as they search for a long-term answer under center. While names like Aaron Rodgers, Russell Wilson, and Justin Fields have made headlines, another potential target—Matthew Stafford—has also surfaced in trade speculation. However, some analysts and insiders are advising the Steelers to steer clear of the veteran quarterback.
Why Stafford Might Not Be the Right Fit for Pittsburgh
1. Age and Durability Concerns
At 37 years old, Stafford is nearing the twilight of his career. While still a capable passer, his recent injury history raises red flags. Over the past few seasons, Stafford has battled various ailments, including elbow, back, and concussion-related issues. The Steelers need stability at quarterback, and relying on a player with durability concerns could backfire.
2. Salary Cap Implications
Stafford is under contract with the Los Angeles Rams through the 2026 season, carrying a hefty cap hit. Acquiring him would require the Steelers to take on a significant portion of his salary, limiting their ability to address other pressing roster needs, such as offensive line depth and defensive reinforcements. Given Pittsburgh’s cap constraints, investing in a younger, more cost-effective quarterback might be the smarter approach.
3. System Fit and Long-Term Vision
The Steelers’ offense under offensive coordinator Arthur Smith is expected to emphasize a balanced attack, featuring a strong running game and play-action passing. While Stafford has thrived in pass-heavy offenses, he may not be the ideal fit for Pittsburgh’s evolving scheme. Additionally, acquiring Stafford would be a short-term solution rather than a long-term answer, potentially delaying the search for a true franchise quarterback.
4. Better Alternatives Available
If Pittsburgh is determined to bring in a veteran quarterback, there are arguably better options. Russell Wilson, for example, could come at a much lower financial cost if he is released by Denver. Justin Fields, still on his rookie contract, offers youth and mobility that could complement the Steelers’ offense. Even Aaron Rodgers, despite the controversy, has a higher upside if healthy. Given these alternatives, prioritizing Stafford over other available quarterbacks may not be the best move.
Conclusion
While Matthew Stafford remains a talented quarterback, the Pittsburgh Steelers would be wise to remove him from their trade considerations. His age, contract situation, and potential injury concerns make him a risky investment. Instead, the Steelers should focus on acquiring a younger quarterback who fits their system and long-term vision. Whether it’s a veteran like Wilson or Fields, or even a rookie in the upcoming draft, Pittsburgh has better options than taking on Stafford’s contract and declining durability.
For now, it seems the best move for the Steelers is to look elsewhere in their ongoing search for a quarterback solution.
